Do you think that photography is closer to 
nature than these water colour paintings of 
leaf bugs?
 
Do you think that the disturbances and possible 
mutations shown in these pictures are necessary 
for evolution?
 
Do you think that vivisection is worse for a 
rabbit than for a fly?
 
Do you think that a tiger has more value than 
an insect, and that malformations of small leaf bugs 
do not matter in the context of nature as a whole?
 
Do you think that the 'restrisk' from nuclear power, 
for example, ill or genetically damaged children is 
just something we have to cope with if we want enough 
energy?
 
Do you think it matters that  we are finding  
morphological damage in leaf bugs and vegetation. 
 
Do you think that mutations, caused by nuclear 
power or gene manipulation in the laboratory, are just 
something we have to live with?
 
Do you think scientists should study possible 
malformations in nature  in areas which are 
polluted by nuclear power plants?
 
Do you think that nuclear waste emitted into 
the air and, for example, the Irish sea is harmless?
 
Do you think it is necessary to alert the 
population immediately after a nuclear 
accident?
 
Do you think people have a right to be afraid
of damage to their health in areas polluted by 
artificial radiation?
 
Do you think it is necessary to lie about the 
dangers of radiation in order not to frighten 
people?
 
How many children will get leukemia  before 
we can admit that nuclear power is dangerous?
 
Do you think we need people and institutions 
who will do independent research in this area?
 
Do you think you could contribute to preserve 
a healthy ecosystem or do other people have to 
do it?
 
Do you think it important to leave a healthy 
ecosystem to our children or should they  have 
to live with our legacy?
 
 
 
If you have any comments you can contact Cornelia
at pause.demon.co.uk
 
Back